Bluemountain...with all due respect I disagree. I am a retired career DEC employee & I know that's not true. A few years back an acquaintence from Utica set the new brook trout record. I saw the fish. All the classic signs of a hatchery fish. In particular, the tail was all beat up which is a classic raceway sign.
No way to verify 100% but I doubt that the Raquette fish was brood stock. Better chance it was native than a brooder. Plenty of wild fish in Raquette and its tribs if you know where to look.
yup they can be. but you can tell when you get a big brooder. they have no tailfin! most ponds in the adks r stocked so theres no garantee that any brooktrout you catch is native. any pics of this beast of a trout?
dec will not allow breeders to be put into the record books! it happened at 13th lake a while back and they revoked the record because it was a broodstock fish.
that would suprise me as even Maine's record BKT (something like 9lbs 2 oz) is a holdover broodstock fish.. and its firm in the record books
NY doesn't do nearly the broodstock stocking that other states like maine does. The vast majority of our stocked stream trout are either 1yr or 2yr old fish...the 2yr fish being 13"-14". And yes, they check all the state record entered brookies to make sure they weren't stocked as brood stock.
NY has disqualified 2 potential records in the past 10 years because they were hatchery brood stock....One fish was caught in the Mohawk river below the Lake Delta dam, the other was 13th lake...
Any news or pics on the record?