Thanks for that info Ed.
Sounds fun to spear those. You guys must have had some fun doing that back in the day!
I just don't see the likelihood of rotenone working on a pond of that scale given its known effects. To undertake a project such as even Ashville would take an immense amount of the chemical to erridicate all of the fish successfully. Deep pond, being about 4x deeper than Ashville I'd say has (had) absolutely no chance at being reclaimed through that process. Its just not how the poison works at its best capacity. Would be pretty neat to read reports of the process' or hear first hand accounts of people who saw them doing it. I will say the folk back then were extremely deveoted to the state fisheries and only doing what were known and accepted practices at the time. If only these same people were still around today I have a feeling they would be doing a lot of good.
Ed, the 'book' mentions after Ashville was reclimed they put Channels in there and then a subsequent survey found none. Excluding other places, but if you mind, are you aware of any in there now? I'm wondering just out of curiousity sake. Those 3 ponds would make some excellent Pike water given the soft scaled prey populations, and some excellent Catfish water as well. Additionally Deep Pd. could maybe still have the qualities to be a self sustaining Trout pd. provided the balance is corrected - but it will only be done if the men with their fingers on the trigger buck up and admit its time for some changes. In MA, CT and NY they are not scared to put Pike and Catfish near Trout. Not only are our guys scared to but we have a lot less to work with. Makes you wonder though how they can still stock more Trout but sustain their Walleye, Catfish, Kokanee, etc programs.
Aw well. I guess thats why we all debate on whether we will spend the money to get an out of state Mass or CT license and half the people here in RI don't even buy a resident one.