I guess looking back on that post you had better stick to clams and farming. Funny how things come back to bite ya.
NO Bite. We got smacked here in the NE, due to consistent jet stream. Most of the rest of the US and the planet were above average.
I know you guys won’t bother to read the data, so here it is....
It’s easy to point at stuff you prefer, until you read the data. I DARE ya!
Quote from: GasBlaster on Apr 18, 2015, 11:48 AM
How about 1850s 1750s and before that . all warmer then now ? What were we doing back then to heat it up . the world is millions of years old . you can't just compare to the last 50 years and cry disaster . I have browsed your Facebook page and its clear there is no hope for you . left wing nut job coolade drinker . other then the politics you seem to be a cool guy so let's just leave politics out of our relationship and talk fishing
Fortunately or unfortunately, I HAVE to go by data to form a buttressed opinion. I DO NOT start with opinion and look for stuff to back it up. Just like catching as opposed to fishing.
:icefish:
I happen to believe in science and verifying the data. Nearly all the denier stuff comes from limited sources, is largely debunked yet still pointed to because they know YOU don’t know it has been debunked.
For example: "The test in science is whether findings can be replicated using different data and methods. More than two dozen reconstructions, using various statistical methods and combinations of proxy records, have supported the broad consensus shown in the original 1998 hockey-stick graph, with variations in how flat the pre-20th century "shaft" appears.[1] The 2007 IPCC Fourth Assessment Report cited 14 reconstructions, 10 of which covered 1,000 years or longer, to support its strengthened conclusion that it was likely that Northern Hemisphere temperatures during the 20th century were the highest in at least the past 1,300 years.[16]” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperature_record_of_the_past_1000_years
This is one of my favs
http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2012/0730/Prominent-climate-change-denier-now-admits-he-was-wrong-video"“Three years ago I identified problems in previous climate studies that, in my mind, threw doubt on the very existence of global warming. Last year, following an intensive research effort involving a dozen scientists, I concluded that global warming was real and that the prior estimates of the rate of warming were correct. I’m now going a step further: Humans are almost entirely the cause.”
And:
"Numerical experiments have been carried out with a two-dimensional sector averaged global climate model with a detailed radiative scheme in order to assess the possible impact of solar and volcanic activities on the Earth’s surface temperature at the secular time scale from 1700 to 1992. Our results indicate that while the general trend of the observed temperature variations on the century time scale can be generated in response to both the solar and volcanic forcings, these are clearly not sufficient to explain the observed 20th century warming and more specifically the warming trend which started at the beginning of the 1970s. However, the lack of volcanism during the period 1925–1960 could account, at least partly, for the observed warming trend in this period. Finally, while Schlesinger and Ramankutty (1994) assumed that random forcing could not be a possible source of the 65–70 year oscillation they detected in the global climate system, our results indicate that the volcanic forcing over the past 150 years could have introduced an oscillation of around 70 years in the Earth’s surface temperature.”
http://www.fs.usda.gov/ccrc/library/biblio/1849And:
“Conclusion: If no other large sources of carbon emissions exist or occur in the future, the peaking of crude oil, natural gas, coal and deforestation/non-fossil-fuels emissions (due to the peaking of population growth) will keep carbon emissions from rising to extremely high values, barring massive releases of methane from the ocean and arctic permafrost (see Appendix 3) or other unknown slow or future-triggered positive-feedback mechanisms. The resulting peak of CO2 concentration will occur at about 2100 at about 450 ppmv with a leveling off at about 380 ppmv for the next several hundred years or so.”
http://www.roperld.com/science/GlobalWarmingPrediction.htmReality is not politics until someone don’t like it. Yeah, Let’s stick to fishing.
:thumbsup: ;)2
