The thing that gets me the most about all this is ..... That people have been fishing beds with out limits for over a century . And I've seen pictures of piles of fish my great great grandparents and uncle's used to catch and all the stories my grandfather had told me over the years of all the fish they used to catch . But yet today 2019 they are still there and seem to be ever yr as they have for many years . Just my two cents on this subject
Yeah Willow slough has it's limit regulations and the gills don't seem to be bigger or more plentiful then the next lake . And I know what you mean about lakes that people don't necessarily Target bluegills I have buddies that go to a couple lakes in Minnesota every year and they catch 11 inch bluegill on a regular with beetle spins.but even with regulations here I don't ever seeing us having that here in Indiana unless you cut everybody off from fishing for years. Those lakes in Minnesota are beautiful lakes and I'm sure have a lot cleaner water and a lot better resources than ours do
The interesting thing is according to research by Illinois Natural History, by removing the mature male bluegills off the beds, we're reducing the overall size of the bluegills. If we want large bluegills we are our own worst enemy. If I managed a pond for large bluegills I would only remove females I have a book of a survey of the fauna of Maxinkuckee Lake -- that was taken at the turn of the 20th century -- that claims bluegills up to 14 inches were present. Very hard to believe but it was done by biologists (Not the INDNR as it didn't exist back then), and I've posted the excerpt here before. I can post it again if anyone wants to see it.
I would enjoy reading this information you have available for maxi with the biologists.