Jim. at least you acknowledge that each person may feel a different way about this issue. You are right about the fish being great fighters, and I will attest that they dive for bottom, take long runs, and then when you think it is over, they take to the air. And it is up to the individual to retain, release or dispose of their catch accordingly. I will also compliment you for not taking the opportunity to belittle other fisherman for their approach to less desirable fish. I could learn a lessen or two from you and your restraint as the urge to defend those of us that do not agree with the castigation of other sportsman becomes too strong to remain silent. If others took your approach from the on-set, then there would be no need to defend , but rather to debate. Keep up the good posting.This issue is not about "old School" as some misguided opinions may deem, but rather about stewardship based upon requests by our DNR staff and reg books. The State staff have requested from many an angler that these Trash fish be discarded period! Then the misguided argumentalists want to condemn those who follow the requests? Fishyboy, get with the times and realize that assisting the DNR with requests is an agenda, not a mentality.
RL I am the "DNR"Wait till the positive side of the so called "trash" fish tourneys start to take hold big $$$ pal, folks will change thier "misguided " tunes in a hurry when they see the amount of money anglers are willing to spend to catch Carp. A wise man once said "we will spare no expense in pursuit of free fish" Killing stuff cause you don't like it is simple minded and outdated and I doubt your states DNR is asking you to leave fish on the bank. How many species do you think consume the millions of carp and sucker fry that hatch each spring? Rough fish still serve a purpose and just because a lot of folks can't see it doesn't mean its not there. Open your mind and look at the big picture.
No matter what you call it. its still a Bowfin its not an exotic or introduced species. Not invasive, kinda cool, fights good when caught, but hey If you guys wanna kill stuff just cause you have no personal use for itthen go right ahead! Then if it ever gets to the point that the species is in trouble you can B*tch that the DEC is wasting money on non-game fish. Or better yet, wait, kill everything thats not a game, sport, or tasty panfish and when someone catches one of the relic Bowfins that remain and takes a picture of it we can have a ten page arguement on whether its legal to possess it long enough to take its picture! did it ever occur to you folks that kill stuff cause its ugly or doesn't seem to have any value, or you can't eat it that some of those species are just really cool to look at and catch ? That "old school" mentality of hey what use is it to me? has really got to go!
I'll say it againReally really got to go!
Looks like you'll have to sneak back to your cabin and add FishBoy to the list of names in your manifesto?
Guess you feel a bit inconsequential eh? Just when things start to die down, then the ole proverbial 'Theres always one in the crowd" kind of kid pops up to stir the pot again. You all can tell who relishes in the joys of controversy. When it dies, he whips it up to a froth again! Bravo to you for having the courage to not leave well enough alone! You should be proud that you were the only one left to demonstrate your need for mud slinging. At least everyone else had the class to let it go, but not yyyooouuuu! Nice that you exposed yourself and intentions for all to read. Now be a good sport like the rest of us, and just move along, and let it be so this site can be about fishing, and not controversy that you stir up. Don't be a cancer, be a cure and go elsewhere if you want to start trouble. Do you not hear the mods right now asking that you act CIVIL with fellow sportsmen and women and children? Grow up OTIS.
HAHAHA! What a joke...